MagiQuest: Live Action Goes Mainstream

This is the first time that live-action roleplaying has gone mass-market in the United States thatI'm aware of. There are plenty of systems like Daggerhere or Nero that are widely played, and even a live-action RPG summer camp that runs in the Bay Area where I live, but as far as I know, MagiQuest is the first mainstream attempt.

It seems to be aimed at Harry Potter fans, utilizing infra-red projecting wands that players can use to cast spells or even to duel each other. Apparently, the wands also remember how much progress their wielder has made, making record-keeping presumably a lot easier. It looks like MagiQuest is setting up locations all of the the U.S. as well as in Japan.

I for one call this a good thing, not knowing a lot about it yet. I like opportunities like this to both roleplay and actually interact with other human beings live. I also think it is a good idea to piggy-back on what every Harry Potter fan wants to do - run around slinging their wand at their friends.

Complaints Delivered With Love

I moved to a new place, left behind the best gaming crew of my life, and settled into a new routine that didn't include any tabletop gaming. Boy did that suck.

So I resolved recently to change it. I found another guy in town who plays some D&D and we're gonna rustle up a couple other players for a monthly (maybe more frequent) game of D&D. I'm running it and I decided to go with 3.5 because... well I really don't like 4e. I had a lot of opinions about it when it came out, and God knows I've complained a bunch about 3.5 and D&D in general, but overall I've had more fun with 3.5 than I have with 4e. This got me thinking about my complaining as a habit.

You see, like all people I complain. I have lambasted D&D for being too clunky, too antiquitous. I rail against WoTC for stripping out the roleplaying and turning it into a fantasy board game. I am all about story-based games. I extol the virtues of Indie Press Revolution, or GURPS, or White Wolf... and some of my best games ever were basically homebrew systems. And when I complain about Attacks of Opportunity or Grappling or 2hours to make an NPC in D&D those complaints are genuine.

BUT...

They are also the complaints of a guy who really loves tabletop roleplaying, and D&D in particular. D&D was my first love, and there remains a deeply nostalgic corner of my heart that secretly enjoys searching through dozens of tables to get the information I seek, while my vocal public side decries bad game-design. I like crunchy tomes full of monsters, and rules to describe every stupid little situation you can imagine. I actually enjoy having so many character options that it takes a week to completely hammer out the details of my next PC.

Sometimes.

I'm sure the novelty will wear off again, once the "I haven't roleplayed in a year" energy subsides. Then I'll be trying to persuade my gaming group to move on to a better, more streamlined, more narrative-friendly system - like Mouseguard.

For now though... I have to go crack open my Psionics Handbook to figure out how the different modes of psionic combat work when I throw that Illithid at my players.

Fun Theory and RPG Theory

I was turned on to a Scandanavian group called The Fun Theory. The theory that the espouse is that it is possible to encourage people to change their behavior for the better by making the behavior more fun. The three behaviors they try to change are: encouraging more transit customers to take the stairs rather than the escalator, encouraging more people to recycle their glass bottles, and getting more people to throw away their trash rather than throw it on the ground.

In all three experiments, they seem to have been successful. There is a video for each one showing what they did and explaining some of the short-term impact that what they did had.

I realized that each example applies to roleplaying games as well. RPGs are ultimately about different kinds of fun. Many use the GNS theory or Big Model to talk about what those kinds of fun are. I am going to propose a very simple model describing three kinds of play that I personally enjoy: exploratory play, competitive play and conceptual play. I will also try to give examples of when these kinds of play come up - not in games that exemplify them, but when in a game that the various kinds of play emerge and what I find fun about them.

Exploratory Play: The Piano Stairs

Exploratory play can take three different forms in my experience. The first is exploring your character. This process happens through the decisions that your character makes when a lot is at stake, and is supported by whatever advancement system is in place in a game system. Your character's capabilities, relationship to self and relationship to the world change over the course of a game, and this is a lot of fun for me.

The second way that exploratory play functions is exploration of the setting. This is the classic sand-box method of running a game, where all of the NPCs and set-pieces are in place, and the PCs get to run wild and interact with everything, learning as they go. This also comes up a lot in movies, when the main character is suddenly initiated into a new organization or is transformed, and there are big reveals for the character and the audience as to what is really going on (examples: Men in Black, Transformers, Interview with a Vampire, etc.)

The third way I see exploratory play happening is exploration of the game system itself. This happens a lot with games among my friends because we tend to love house rules. It can also be fun to explore a new game system, to see how the various rules and methods work (or don't work) and why. If I had unlimited free time, or was independently wealthy or something, I would try playing through the same story with the same character concepts but using two different systems in order to see how the story elements changed.

Competitive Play: The Bottle Bank Arcade

Competitive play is simple - you are trying to "win". This is what the majority of people probably think of when you say the word "game", and applies to football, Monopoly and chess as examples. There is a winner, or winners, and a loser, or losers. On the surface it seems like a zero-sum game, where one side's loss is another side's game.

Even a zero-sum game can have some emergent fun, however, whether one wins or loses. When my wife and I play a game, and she wins, I get some enjoyment out of her winning. I can also enjoy being just barely beaten in a closely-fought game that comes down to the wire. I'd probably enjoy winning more, but the tension over what will happen is in itself fun.

I really love games where the players collectively play against the game itself, like Shadows Over Camelot or Pandemic. In this case, you get all of the competition, but fewer of the hard feelings that might come up when people compete against each other (except for the filthy traitor of course!).

Conceptual Play: The World's Deepest Trash Bin

Conceptual play in my experience is when I am using a game to work something out that isn't necessarily related to the game. I might be using the game to work through what happens when a character is made a messiah against his will by an oppressed people, or to think through what it is like in the day-to-day life of a vampire. I might be using a game like Mage: the Ascension to play through metaphysical theories or to express what I really think about the world and our place in it.

Exploratory play is playing a game for it's own sake. Competitive play is playing a game for the sake of the thrill of victory and, in some ways, the agony of defeat as well. Conceptual play is using the game as a vehicle for something else. Unsurprisingly, collaborative games are an excellent way to do this conceptual work. Role-playing is used in therapy, for example, to work through relationship issues, and some games have been designed with the expressed purpose of working through a game-designer's issues (I am thinking of Clyde Rhoer, Paul Czege or Vince Baker as examples of designers with this goal).

Things don't have to be that deep either. A conceptual game might be something like "Hey, how about zombies in a Western?" and hence, Deadlands is born. Genre mash-ups can work out really well, like Eberron, the fantasy-pulp-noir setting by Rich Baker for D&D.

Anyway, those are the thoughts I wanted to get out there based on what I saw in The Fun Theory. So far, this is a more helpful way of thinking about games than GNS has been for me, in part because these are three kinds of fun that I have had in a game that I can identify. I still don't think I've experienced 'pure' Narrativism, and I've never heard Simulationism defined by someone who actually does it and enjoys it (only with, at best, well-hidden contempt).

On Sunday It Begins

Sunday is the beginning of November which, as everyone knows is National Novel Writing Month. This year I don't plan on writing a novel because I have too much other work to do, but I am going to try to set a NaNoWriMo pace, which is about 1,667 words a day for 30 days.

The first project I have before me is to finish the playtest document and rough draft for Horror!. I've made some progress already, but it isn't ready to be sent out to playtesters yet.

The second project I have in front of me is working on a full draft and playtest document for Heroes of Karia. I've run 3 playtests of Karia so far and it is going well, but I need to have something that is more put-together to send out.

The third project is in case I finish the first two (which is plausible with that kind of writing pace - game books take more work but contain fewer words than comparable novels). Right now I'm calling this project Succubus: A Love Story. The idea I have is for a genre-buster that is about 2/3 sexy high school love story and 1/3 existential horror. I think I can get it out in a short story form, and the idea has been with me for a while. I can tell it's the kind of thing I need to use NaNoWriMo to get out of my system (and find out if it is worth putting real work into aside from a rough draft.

Anyone else working on something for NaNoWriMo?

bySwarm

I've put my own two offerings forward for bySwarm's rpg setting contest. Put up your own ideas here, and be sure to read up on mine and rate them. (username Robosnake)

What they're doing over at bySwarm is working on an experiment in collective setting design. Right now people like myself with too much free time are posting setting theme documents for consideration. At some point they'll select something, by popular vote it looks like, to expand upon and to attach to an rpg system.

Anyway, it looks interesting. Right now there don't seem to be that many posts, but it is cool to get in on or near the 'ground floor' in something like this.

Goodman Games' Cash for Clunkers Program

It worked so well for the auto industry (at least in the short term) that Goodman Games has set up it's own Cash for Clunkers program. Turn in your old, out-dated, fuel-inefficient WotC 3.0 and 3.5 books for a discount on products from Goodman Games. Your discount is equal to 20% of the original cover price of the books as long as they are in good condition.

Here's the info on Goodman Games' site.

Not quite a government bailout for the rpg industry, but clever nonetheless. I'm actually probably going to send in my 3.0 core rulebooks - I might as well get some value out of them, right?

Rightful Humiliation

Just in case anyone who reads this blog thinks, even for a moment, that they run a pretty good D&D game, you should really take a look at the kinds of things that Gabe from Penny Arcade does with his group.

Truly amazing.

An Idea for Epic

As is often the case, when I laid down and actually tried to sleep, I had an idea instead. I thought - why not post it to the blog so I don't forget?

This is way back with Epic, which I haven't posted about for a long time.

The idea is for the static attributes - Endurance, Perception, Memory, Appeal and Will - to be basically check-boxes that the player can call upon once per story arc. So for each point of Endurance, there is a check box, and at any time during a story arc the player can check a box to have something happen for her character. Instead of points to keep track of, these are a lot simpler. For example: Endurance could be used to shrug off a wound, Perception to notice a clue, Memory to answer a question, Appeal to get attention or take the initiative socially and Will to resist an outside influence.

Something like that. I like the simplicity of the system - the main challenge would be, with attributes rated 1 to 10 with 4-5 as average, that it would be hard to use all of the check boxes in a single story arc. Needs a lot more thought, but hey, it's just the idea that kept me awake (which doesn't take much)

Word of Anesthesiacraft

I've been listening to a lot of podcasts now that I am mostly unemployed, one of which is NPR's Science Friday podcast. In catching up on back episodes, I came upon a topic from September 18th - the relationship, during the Romantic period, between science (natural philosophy at the time) and the arts. One vignette is about Samuel Taylor Coleridge helping his friend Humphrey Davy experiment with the effects of nitrous oxide (laughing gas). Davy finds that nitrous has an anesthetic effect, and writes a paper saying that this could be used in surgery. At the time, however, it was thought that the agony of surgeries like amputations was medically necessary, however, because it was believed that this mobilized the body to heal.

Now we know better, for physical ailments anyway, but this podcast has had me thinking all day. In my own experience, emotional pain can be very necessary to enact change or healing in a person's life, much the way that physical pain was thought to be necessary to surgical patients in the 1800s. In thinking along these lines, it suddenly struck me that WoW is serving me as an anesthetic for my feelings of boredom at this point in my life.

I compared it to nitrous oxide. I enjoy playing WoW, just like I'm sure I'd enjoy taking some recreational nitrous oxide. I know WoW isn't as extreme as abusing a medical anesthetic, but the connection was made in my mind. What I realized is that it may be necessary, in order for me to be more creative and more productive in my creative endeavors, to take a break from WoW so that I will have to feel my boredom. Hopefully it will motivate me to do something about it.

We'll see how it goes. I want to see if I am in fact more productive, or if I am instead just more bored without WoW for a while.

Anybody out there had an experience of taking a break from some consuming hobby? What was it like for you?

Ken Hite, Tim Powers, and the Great Old One Himself

Image: Bruce Timm's rendition of Lovecraft, c/o Dark Forces Book Group

I was having a conversation with a friend and colleague today about a number of things, among them Tim Powers and H. P. Lovecraft. Feel free to check out more about both of these authors if you're interested via Wikipedia. Whoever is reading this blog probably knows who Lovecraft is and may or may not know who Tim Powers is (he's an award-winning fantasy author who focuses on secret histories).

I was reflecting on a quote from Lovecraft, and something occurred to me - the fact that along one axis at least, Powers and Lovecraft are mirror images of each other. The Lovecraft quote is this:

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. This quote is the first line from Lovecraft's most famous tale, The Call of Cthulhu. What Lovecraft seems to be alluding to here, as well as in other works, is that if one were to understand the totality of existence, one would fall into madness and despair, and that our inability to fully comprehend is our salvation as a species. As long as we are in the dark, we are ok. When the truth is revealed to us, it shatters us.

I compared this to Tim Powers. What Tim Powers is good at is writing fantasy that takes place in the lives of known, historical figures and events. He takes the supernatural and intersperses it into history almost seamlessly, so that you come away from the story thinking "For all I know, that's how it went." He does this by doing a tremendous amount of research both on the 'official' history of people like Romantic poets or famous pirates or Cold Warriors and then finds the spaces between what is recorded them and inserts the fantastic.

What Tim Powers does, in other words, is he skillfully correlates the contents of his mind. Because he is able to do this, he is able to put together truly amazing stories that do not have to shatter our accepted history, but only embellish it, like a virtuoso soloist in a jazz ensemble. The soloist isn't breaking the music, s/he's making it even more beautiful and evocative.

Where Lovecraft saw horror and insanity, Powers sees beauty and stories worth telling, and both of them take their jumping-off place, in part, from correlation. Lovecraft looks at the immensity of experience and thinks "Behind all this is some kind of seething, infinite darkness which means us ill." Powers looks at the same immensity and complexity and interconnectedness and thinks "I bet I can tell a story about Lord Byron the vampire hunter, or the Cold War fought by means of genies, or Texas Hold 'em players fighting for control of a Tarot-throne in Las Vegas."

In the final analysis, while Lovecraft has had a far greater impact on our culture than Powers, I prefer Powers' view. It is another kind of genius. Rather than fear, Powers tends to offer wonder. Both writers are awe-ful in their own way, however, and very much worth reading.

***

I only mentioned Ken Hite in this post because he is the author of many superb books on the Lovecraft Mythos, the most recent of which is Cthulhu 101. Look for it wherever games or comics are sold.

D&D Game Day Sept 2009

Yesterday was D&D Game Day, celebrating the release of the Dungeon Master's Guide 2. I remain conflicted about the DMG2. On the one hand, I read through it, and it actually has a lot of good advice for running games, especially pointed toward breaking DMs out of the 'standard' mode (long supported by all traditional rpgs) - that of the DM-as-author and players-as-tactical-combatants who also sometimes get to speak a few lines.

On the other hand, I'm aggravated by the slew of extra "basic set" books that WotC seems intent on putting out there. I mean, are we going to have the PHB5? 10? Where does it stop? When will diminishing returns really kick in? I'm finding that my thinking is moving away from the traditional supplement model of rpgs.

That being said, I can recommend the DMG2 for beginner DMs who want to up their game or for anyone who wants to get a lot of solid-seeming advice on how to run games more skillfully. This is not a crunchy book at all - in fact, it is downright chewy. There is a lot in there to think about, particularly if you are new to games, or are stuck in a kick-in-the-door-kill-the-baddie rut.

For my part, I came down to the FLGS here in San Rafael and ran a little module for some eager players. It was a lot of fun, and I learned something. 4th Edition runs really well with three players. I used three of the PCs distributed by WotC for use in games running on D&D Game Day (I let the players choose from the 5 there were) and just altered the encounters I'd set up to accommodate fewer PCs. It was probably the most fun I've had running 4th Edition D&D - about 3 solid hours of fun and no dragging. Lots of ass was kicked.

So I recommend tossing out the idea of the 'classic' 4-PC D&D party for a try. Go with 3 or even 2. I think the game not only works well, but actually better, with fewer players. You can't throw as much at them, and that is it's own kind of fun; I just felt like more happened.

Grab A Cold "Bigby's Crushing Thirst Destroyer" From the Fridge, Will Ya?

Ok, I'm not sure if you can read the pic, but apparently Jones is producing a limited edition of "official" D&D Spellcasting Soda. At ten bucks for a six-pack (plus shipping - I can only imagine) it's on par with the beer I drink I suppose, and could definitely be worth handing out during a game just for the morale-boost. I also can't disparage anyone brave enough to drink Illithid Brain Juice.

Not to mention - whoever it is who squeezes it in the first place.

::shudder::

Pathfinder Wiki

Speaking of Pathfinder, this is a heck of a resource...

Pathfinder Wiki

Pathfinder RPG: Skills and Feats

Skills in Pathfinder are one of the systems that undergo the least amount of change in their new edition. The big exceptions are the additions of Acrobatics, Fly, Linguistics and Perception. (4E combines Climb and Swim into Athletics, which I like)

Acrobatics
Pathfinder combines Jump and Tumble into Acrobatics, basically much as 4E does. This is just some good consolidation of similar skills. You can still tumble around, or through, opponents' squares with an Acrobatics roll, but instead of a set DC, the DC is based on your opponent's Combat Maneuver Defense - something I'll explain later when I delve into system changes.

Fly
Fly is a new skill which is interesting. It sort of makes sense, given the many ways a character might be flying in D20. Basically, you make skill checks to do things like hover or make turns when flying in tactical combat. Fly checks are modified by a creature's maneuverability score, as one would expect.

Linguistics
This is the skill that combines Decipher Script as well as speaking multiple languages. For each rank putinto this skill, your character speaks another language. This will result in characters easily speaking a LOT of languages - as I recall, this is similar to 3.0, where I think one skill rank bought you fluency in a language.

Perception
Perception is just a combination of Listen, Search and Spot, which is a good way to simplify (which 4E also uses).

Next, we turn to Feats.

When I read the Feats section of the Pathfinder RPG, I was surprised at how many there were. There are four full pages of Feats listed in a table much like you found in 3.5 (though it was half as long). Some are genuinely new, whereas others are taken from supplements. A large number of Feats are expansions of combat Feats you're probably already familiar with. First I'll mention a few Feats that are expanded upon (that is, longer chains attached to them), and then I'll pick out a couple interesting individual Feats.

Combat Expertise has 7 Feats it is a prerequisite for, where Critical Focus (distinct from Improved Critical) has 9 in its chain. Dodge has Wind Stance and Lightening Stance as well Mobility and Spring Attack; Improved Unarmed Strike has a total of 8 Feats attached to it. There are also more missile feats, more rooted in Power Attack, and Weapon Focus has 9 in it's 'chain'. (This is good news, considering characters will have a lot more Feats than in 3.5, getting one at every odd-numbered level - giving Fighters a Feat per level, for example).

Arcane Armor Training
There are two Arcane Armor Training Feats, and each reduces your Arcane spell failure chance due to wearing armor. I've always liked this idea, not necessarily buying that arcane spellcasters have any logical reason to be "clothies" other than long-standing convention.

Deadly Aim
This Feat is like Power Attack, but for ranged attacks, which is a cool idea.

Intimidating Prowess
This Feat is a house rule of mine - you add Str to Intimidate checks rather than Cha. This has always made sense to me, since being huge is in itself intimidating, regardless of what your social skills look like.

Vital Strike
This Feat is kind of exciting if you want to just deal out damage. This Feat lets you double your weapon damage dice on a single attack...every time. If you have multiple attacks, then the one at your highest attack bonus doubles it's dice. So that longsword now deals 2d8 if you hit with your best attack, and so on. And yes, you can build on the Feat from there, dealing 3x and even 4x dice in damage with your highest attack.

There are a lot of other exciting Feats in the Pathfinder RPG, but I don't want to go into all of them. Suffice to say, you'll still have hard decisions to make when choosing Feats as you level, and looking through, there are enough Feats to take away the 'obvious' Feat decisions from 3.5's core PHB. This means more versatility and more interesting specialization. I can see multiple Fighter builds, for example, that would be very different from each other, and that in itself is cool.

Pathfinder RPG: Races and Classes

Let's get right down to business, shall we?

In Pathfinder, attributes are no different from 3.x, but races have been beefed up. Pathfinder, in general, makes characters stronger at level 1 - something Paizo and WotC agree on, apparently.

Dwarves
Dwarves have all the usual weird AC and attack bonuses against giants and goblinoids and so on, as well as their usual Stability ability. The main difference compared to 3.x is that Dwarves get a +2 to Constitution and Wisdom to go with their -2 to Charisma. Their fluff is what it always is - gruff blah blah blah honorable blah blah blah stone and metal, etc.

Elves
D&D's metrosexuals get +2 to both Dexterity and Intelligence to balance their -2 to Constitution. Otherwise, they are generally unchanged in fluff and so on.

Gnomes
Based on their artwork in the book, Gnomes seem to be the sort of zany trickster' race (whereas Halflings tend to be creepy and childlike). Gnomes get a +2 to Constitution and Charisma and the usual -2 to Strength. One additional ability is Obsessive, which gives them a +2 to a Craft and a Profession of their choice. Their fluff is what you'd expect.

Half-Elves
The other metrosexual race gets a straight +2 to an ability of their choice. They also receive the Skill Focus Feat for free at 1st level. Lastly, Half-Elves choose 2 favored classes, and they get the +1 HP per level or +1 skill rank per level bonus when they take levels in those two classes (and that's how favored classes function - you get one of those two bonuses).

Half-Orcs
Oddly, Half-Orces also get a +2 to an ability of their choice - even though all of their fluff implies a lack of Charisma and their art implies a whole lot of Strength and Constitution. Otherwise, they are Intimidating (they get +2 to Intimidate), and they have Orc Ferocity, which lets them fight on at exactly 0 hit points for one round before they are knocked unconscious.

All in all, I think that Half-Orcs get the short end of the stick...as usual.

Halflings
The wee ones are still wee - not the enlarged 4E versions. They get a +2 to Dexterity and a +2 to Charisma and the usual -2 to Strength. They also get the bonuses they did in 3.5, so nothing big that's new here. Halfling fluff has them as scavengers at the fringes of society when they settle down, or nomadic wanderers otherwise.

Humans
Like both half-races, Humans get a +2 in any ability, and their usual extra Feat and Skill rank.

Now, to the classes...

In listening to a lot of interviews with the Paizo guys and reading what they're writing about their work, they had a goal for each class that every level would give you something more than the basic extra HD and so on. Everyone gets candy at every level. You also get a Feat every two levels - but in addition to the Feat, there is still candy.

Oh, good to note - as we get into caster descriptions, all casters (Bards, Clerics, Druids, Sorcerers and Wizards) have 0-level spells that they can cast all day long. This is cool, but I don't want to repeat it :)

Barbarian
The candy that the Barbarian gets is the ability to add effects to her Rage ability, like Animal Fury or Guarded Stance or No Escape (what are these? Buy the book! :). These powers just stack up, so at some point when you Rage, you become a crazy killing-machine. Otherwise, the Barbarian is very recognizeable from 3.5.

Bard
Bardic Knowledge is expanded a bit to make it more versatile, and the end result is that the Bard is the master of Knowledge skills, whether she has ranks in them or not. Bardic Music is also expanded in power and versatility, and the Bard retains her spells. The Bard is one of the classes to get a bump in hit dice, so each level you roll a d8 instead of a d6. As they level, Bards also become masters of using skills untrained, and at level 20, a Bard can kill with her musical performance. Nice.

Cleric
The biggest thing about the Cleric, for me, is the loss of Turn Undead (though it rears its ugly head as a Feat...). Instead, you just channel positive or negative enrgy - if you read the playtest pdf, then you're already familiar with this, as well as the fact that Clerics can use medium armor but not heavy. Another cool change is with Domains - not only do you get the bonus Domain spells, you also get one of two Domain abilities for each of your Domains - and these are cool, colorful, and useful.

Druid
Clerics have Nature's Bond, which gives one option as having an animal companion. The other option is to have a Cleric Domain: Air, Animal, Earth, Fire, Plant, Water or Weather, including the bonus spell and powers associated with it. Otherwise, actually, Druids haven't changed much from 3.5.

Fighter
Fighters get an overhaul and a straight infusion of awesome. They still have bonus Feats as in 3.5, but they also get a Bravery bonus to Will saves against Fear (something I've always wanted). They also get Armor Training, which reduces the penalties for heavy armor, as well as Weapon Training, which gives stacking +1 bonuses to categories of weapons so that at 20th level, a Fighter can use one category of weapon and get a +4 to hit and damage, as well as confirming every critical hit automatically.

Monk
Monks are also very much the same, except they have a ki pool, a pool of points that the Monk can spend to make extra attacks, go faster for a round or dodge for effectively.

Paladin
The main difference with Paladins is that their Lay on Hands gets augmented significantly. Now, when a Paladin uses her Lay on Hands, she also has an ability called a Mercy that takes effect. What the Mercy does is it removes one or more conditions from the recipient of the LoH. A Paladin also has overlapping Auras, each granting her immunity to some kind of supernatural effect and granting her nearby allies a bonus to defend against it.

Ranger
The Ranger gets bumped back up to d10 hit dice, and on top of the Favored Enemes, the Ranger also gets Favored Terrains. The Ranger also has a new Quarry ability, which is a lot like marking abilities from 4E or MMORPGs, meaning the Ranger chooses one target and murders it.

Rogue
Rogues have talents now that at every even level, alternating with Sneak Attack. Talents include crippling and bleed effects, as well as defensive abilities, some culled from 3.5 supplements and some originals like Dispelling Attack.

Sorcerers
Sorcerer bloodlines are expanded upon, and add a lot of coolness to the class. The Sorcerer is assumed to have her abilities because of her ancestry - she has some kind of supernatural blood flowing through her veins, including undead, demonic, draconic or fey. This bloodline gives her specific bonus spells and a few abilities as she goes up in level which are in line with the bloodline.

Wizard
Wizards now get special abilities when they specialize in a particular school, including some kind of at-will basic attack ability which is a nice bonus for the Wizard, particularly at lower levels when you blow those couple Magic Missiles and then twiddle your thumbs in previous editions.

Basically, every class is improved and made more interesting, as well as more powerful. I can only assume the RPG Bestiary will make all these new powers necessary. Pitting these new classes against 'classic' MM critters just seems unfair...

Next up, Skills and Feats

Pathfinder RPG: First Impressions

At 575 pages, this book is a heavyweight in the RPG world. Not quite Ptolus heavy, but a runner-up, up there with Hero, and potentially just as able to stop a bullet.

From the get-go, it's worth noting that Paizo's Pathfinder RPG is D&D 3.5 with some changes. If you didn't like 3.x, you won't like Pathfinder. If you liked 3.x, then Pathfinder is better in pretty much every way.

Layout and design for the book is pleasing but also simple. There's probably art on every 3rd-4th page, and it is the beautiful, evocative artwork that I associate with Pathfinder.

The chapters are as follows:
Getting Started
Races
Classes
Skills
Feats
Equipment
Additional Rules
Combat
Magic
Spells
Prestige Classes
Gamemastering
Environment
Creating NPCs
Magic Items
Followed by Appendices 1-4

As you can see, this book covers the territory of the original PHb and DMG together, making the price-tag ($50) actually pretty reasonable.

Next, I'll be delving into this heavy tome, focusing on races and classes, then feats and skills, followed by combat and prestige classes, then magic and magic items, and finally some closing thoughts. So an Pathfinder-stravaganza. Before you bother to read all of that, though, I want to reiterate - if you like 3.x D&D, get this game. You will like this better, and I have a feeling that Paizo will stick with this for a long time yet before they try any Pathfinder 2.0 crap :)

How I Made D&D Cooler Part 2: Characters

Here's an example of a character sheet I sketched out for one of the characters in my D&D game:
[Stolen Image from the Internet]

“Cornelius Finch” Lvl 5 Human Huckster of Evil

Str 12 Con 9 Dex 13 Int 14 Wis 10 Cha 17
HP 22 [ ] , Bloodied 10, +1 Leather 2, Initiative +4
Surges 7, Healing 4
Melee +4, Missile +6,
Fortitude 12, Reflex 17, Will 18
Feats: Smooth Talker, Dodge
Special: Extra Skill, Extra Feat

At-Will: MW Throwing Knives +6 (1d4+5) or +4 (1d4+5), Bluff +10, Diplomacy +10, History +7, Insight +6, Sailing +8, Stealth +6, Thievery +6, Default +3, Bardic Inspiration (+1 to rolls and damage), Helpful Anecdote +2

*Encounter: Entrancement +8

**Utility: Suggestion +8

***Daily: Charm +8, Lesser Geas +8

Pretty simple; I'll go through it bit by bit. A lot of this is being familiar with the D20 system and working things out organically. As I said before, this isn't a new system or anything, just a way to play D&D without having fifteen books at the table or having drawn-out rules arguments - basically, beginner-friendly with some Doug-ish twists.

“Cornelius Finch” Lvl 5 Human Huckster of Evil
The class is Huckster of Evil based on the players' description of his character concept, which most resembled a fast-talking, capitalistic Bard. Levels work the same as usual - his level is his number of "hit dice" and is also added to d20 rolls and defenses as it is in 4th Edition.

As you can see, I kept the usual clunky ability scores, where you subtract 10 and then divide by 2 for the actual bonus. This is just a D&D convention that people are used to.

+1 Leather 2
Armor in this version simply provides DR/-, or damage resistance against everything physical. In this case, I divided the listed AC bonus for leather armor by 2 and that was the DR for the armor. Because it is +1 magical armor, I add 1 to that number, for a total of 2. Easy.

Surges 7, Healing 4
Surges, as I said, are a player resource to boost particular actions their characters attempt. They are like a more versatile version of the action points from Unearthed Arcana and the like. The "healing" rating is a flat number that represents the character's rate of recovery from Hit Point loss. I get the number by taking their level and adding their Con bonus - in this case, Cornelius' Con has a -1 penalty because it is a 9. So when he rests for a full night, he gets 4HP back. When someone casts Cure Ligh Wounds on him, he gets a base of 4HP back. When he spends a Surge to have a second wind, he recovers 4HP - you get the idea.

Melee +4, Missile +6
Every character has a base melee and missile attack score, just for ease of reference. In this case, the Bard is trained in either melee or missile, and Cornelius is trained in missile. That means that his melee bonus is equal to 1/2 level + Str mod + Feats, etc. and his missile bonus is level + Dex mod + Feats, etc. He has no combat feats, so the math is simple.

Fortitude 12, Reflex 17, Will 18
In keeping with D20, the Bard has trained Reflex and Will and untrained Fortitude defense. I also used the 4E convention where Fortitude can be modified by either Strength or Constitution, Reflex either Dexterity or Intelligence, and Will either Wisdom or Charisma - that's a cool little rule. So, Cornelius' Fortitude defense is 10 + 1/2 level + Str OR Con mod + Feats etc. and his Will defense is 10 + level + Wis or Cha mod + Feats, etc.

At-Will
For at-will abilities, I include basic attacks, basic (first-tier) Feats, and skills. These are all the things you can do in-game, basically, that will have some set effect on the fiction and that you don't have to pay Surges for.

Encounter
Encounter powers cost 1 Surge to use, and in this case, Entrancement works like an attack against Will defense much as it functions in the 3.5 PHb - you can use it to distract people with your performance. The difference, to make this potentially useable in combat, is that you can use it against targets even if they are threatened. They take a -2 penalty to their first action after the entrancement is broken by taking damage or a bigger distraction elsewhere.

All of the rules for these powers are made up and discussed with the player in question. I take what is in the official books as a starting point and then simplify and streamline what I find.

Utility
Cornelius' Utility power is Suggestion, and costs 2 Surges to use, like any Utility power in this system. This is also similar to the 3.5 PHb, and can have you "suggest" anything short of suicide.

Daily
Cornelius, at level 5, has 2 Daily powers, each of which cost 3 Surges to use. The first he's always had - Charm is basically Charm Person - the target becomes your best friend for a scene. The second is the new one - Lesser Geas. The player specifically requested an ability to create magically-enforced contracts to function in his scam-artistry. Again, much like what is in the books.

The way I work out how many Encounter, Utility and Daily powers a character has is pretty simple, and I use 4E as a starting-point.

1st Level: 1 Encounter and 1 Daily (and technically, here, if you use the Daily, you won't have enough Surges to also use the Encounter unless you earn one...)
2nd Level: 1 Encounter, 1 Utility and 1 Daily (and again, you have to choose, since you only have 4 Surges to start a session)
3rd Level: Move one power down on the list and replace it with another - usually move an Encounter power down to At-Will and add a new Encounter power
4th Level: 2 Encounter powers, 1 Utility and 1 Daily
5th Level: 2 Encounter powers, 1 Utility and 2 Daily
6th Level: the character automatically gets a "Prestige Class", and gets the new abilities from that class

And so on...I haven't gone past level 6, but you hopefully get the idea.

In playtesting so far, this sytem has led to much faster-paced D&D games with a lot more happening. I also really enjoy having social powers, particularly in Cornelius' case, so that a player-character can kick ass between fight scenes. Who enjoys being schooled by the local magic item salesmen at level 10? If one character can kill dragons, another should at least be able to win arguments...

Pathfinder RPG

Just picked up the Pathfinder RPG. At least one review will be forthcoming...

Game Addiction Therapists Treated For Addiction to Gaming

This is the real headline: "Therapists Join World of Warcraft to Treat 'Addicted' Players."

The story is that a group of therapists are asking Blizzard for free access to WoW to search for and identify people addicted to the game. This is because, they say, that true addicts are hard to reach by other means since they are always in their rooms.

While it is no doubt, well intentioned, I couldn't help but see this as a situation ripe for parody. It will probably start well, but 6 months down the line this is what I predict:

Therapist: Die! crazy cat lady die!

Assistant: Dr. we've received an email from another concerned parent...

Therapist: Shhh!!

Assistant: Yes but...

Therapist: Shhh!!! I told you not to bother me when I'm raidin... fuck. Another wipe.

Assistant: I know, but I thought you might be interested, this seems like a serious case.

Therapist: Do you know how many times we've tried this fight? She's one sadistic little...

Assistant: The kid's name is Ryan. His character on your server is a Tauren Druid named Wowzalot. His mom says he has been playing about 17 or 18 hours a day lately.

Therapist: Fine. Fine. Make up a file and put it on my desk. I'll go over it after... did you say a Druid? What spec? We could really use a tree in our raid!

Assistant: I don't think that's what his mom had in mind when she asked us to help intervene.

Therapist: Yeah, probably not. Oh well. Listen we'll have to talk about this later, the group is reforming, gotta buff up.

Assistant: Sir...

Therapist: What!?! I told you we're about to start again!

Assistant: Don't you think you've been playing a little bit too much lately...

Therapist: Don't start that again! I pay you to answer phones, not to be my personal nag.

Assistant: Okay...

Therapist: Here we go! Bitch is goin' down this time! Ayaaaaaaaghghhh....